Previous Arbiter for the nation's highest court Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi has expressed that after his abdication, the Preeminent Legal Board has "no locale to start or go on with any procedures" against him, it arose on Friday.
The previous appointed authority is confronting a request over claims of wrongdoing, a show-cause notice for which was given in October last year.
In a letter wrote to Boss Equity of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa and all top court decided in December, he had expressed that the treatment dispensed to him by the SJC was "out and out shameful".
After the peak court last month dismissed his solicitation to remain the procedures, Equity Naqvi had offered his renunciation refering to "conditions which involve public information and somewhat openly available report". His renunciation was thusly acknowledged by the president.
In any case, the SJC went on with the procedures against him despite the fact that it anticipates the result of an intra-court request by the national government testing a SC judgment (Afiya Shehrbano Zia) connected with the ward over resigned or surrendered judges.
The 2023 zenith court decision had held that judges who resign or leave don't fall inside the ambit of Article 209 of the Constitution that decides unfortunate behavior of predominant court judges.
A day prior, the SJC was informed that a confidential designer, Lahore Brilliant City (Pvt) Ltd, gave one of the two broker checks of Rs50 million each for purchasing a private plot for Equity Naqvi. The committee is set to continue the consultation today (Friday).
In a letter to the SJC secretary, a duplicate of which is accessible with Dawn.com, Equity Naqvi said that he was conveyed the gathering's organization dated January 12 which showed that procedures against him went on regardless of him having surrendered and done excess a SC judge after President Arif Alvi acknowledged his renunciation.
The letter arose on Friday and was not dated.
Taking note of that the chamber was going on with the procedures under Article 209 of the Constitution, he expressed: "This is to illuminate that according to the law and the Constitution the way things are today as well as past points of reference, the SJC has no ward to start or go on with any procedures under Article 209 of the Constitution in any matter relating to a presently not individual holding the workplace of predominant court for example high court or High Court."
The previous adjudicator further said that the January 12 request and resulting procedures were "unlawful and without legal power". He affirmed that the SJC was "acting past its purview".
"Thusly, I'm neither obliged nor lawfully or unavoidably bound to partake in these procedures which are without protected space," Equity Naqvi composed.
Taking note of that Khawaja Harris Ahmad was addressing him before the chamber, he said the legal authority reached out to the legal counselor was "not any more in [the] field and has become infructuous" as he was at this point not a SC judge.
"Be that as it may, to determine any equivocalness in such manner, the general legal authority is thus removed and stands dropped by the undersigned. You are consequently mentioned to illuminate the SJC as needs be," the letter expressed.
Tags
Latest News